![]() I hope I'm on the same path as the OP, if not, I apolgize and will leave it at this I know, but it's still repetitive work that can be minimized I think ![]() I would be really surprised to be the only one seeing the advantage in this.Ī layer for sharpening with certain parameters on which I mask the areas that I want to use, same goes forĪ layer for blurring with certain parametersĪ layer for contrast/saturation with certain parameters Imagine the potential of this when assigning this style on import. While it all could be combined into one style. That still would mean that one has to create the set of layers that apply to that job and then assign styles to those layers. It's not unreasonable to keep in mind some of us have repeating subjects and workflows It has been available since Local Adjustments were introduced as far as I remember. In that case would it not be easier to simply create a "master" image with multiple layers and then copy the results to all of the other images to which you want them to apply? That seems likely to give you the same result, complete with masks. Well given that the change in approach to Layers has only just occurred with V11 I suspect it might be a good idea to make sure the basics work out in the wild before moving on to anything more complex.īeyond that I'm really not sure that a "style" that involves multiple layers and varying masks would be all that useful in a library - unless you always shoot more or less the same things. ![]() It might be convenient instead of repeating the creation of these layers on a multitude of images. I would say when somebody is saving "layers in a style" a style is created with one or more layers, each with their purpose such as Sharpening, contrast, or whatever. I'm not sure how you are thinking about what a style is here.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |